On Wednesday, 18 October, Marius Ezer, Partner in NNDKP`s Dispute Resolution practice, was a speaker at the debate „Can the new restructuring mechanisms, the restructuring agreement and the preventive agreement save the Romanian companies in difficulty?”, organized by Juridice.ro.
Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen (NNDKP) was named Tax Disputes Firm of the Year in Romania at the 2023 edition of ITR EMEA Tax Awards organized by International Tax Review on September 27th at the Carlton Tower Jumeirah in London. The 18th edition of the awards acknowledges the innovative approach, performance, and key role played by the strongest tax, tax disputes and transfer pricing teams of experts across 34 jurisdictions throughout the region in developing the global advisory services market.
NNDKP has successfully finalized the two successive arbitration cases related to the design and execution of one of the four sections of the Sebes-Turda motorway.
On 22 June, 2023, Juridice.ro organized the „Urban Planning Law: the storm before the calm” online live conference.
It has been an absolute pleasure for NNDKP to host on June 9, 2023 the ArbitralWomen Networking Reception together with ArbitralWomen.
Dragoș Pigui
NNDKP successfully represented a major local food supplier in connection with the annulment of the fine imposed by the Competition Council following an investigation initiated in 2009 for alleged anti-competitive agreements between several suppliers and retailers operating in the domestic market.
On March 16, 2023, Chambers & Partners released the results of its 2022 European research, a benchmark when it comes to recognizing prominent law firms and leading legal practitioners in the region.
Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen (NNDKP) successfully represented ENEL (E-Distributie Banat) in a complex tax dispute relating to the possibility of the taxpayer deducting the value of tax depreciation for tangible assets (electricity grid connectors) acquired from the company’s clients through transfer, for the calculation of corporate income tax. Initially, tax authorities rejected this possibility based on the way in which the company acquired the connectors (free of charge) and considering the existence of accounting depreciation rules different from the tax depreciation rules that were used.
